SEC chairman fiercely criticized by members of Congress for cryptocurrency regulation: 'The most lawless SEC chairman in history'
US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Gary Gensler was heavily criticized by lawmakers from both parties during a congressional hearing yesterday for mishandling cryptocurrency regulation issues.
The lawless SEC chairman
According to The Block, during the House Financial Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, Republican whip Tom Emmer asked Gary Gensler about the case between the SEC and cryptocurrency startup DEBT Box. A federal judge in Utah once criticized the SEC for poor performance in handling the case, stating that their actions were inappropriate. In the end, the institution was ordered to pay sanctions, including legal fees and related expenses. The judge also criticized the misleading statements made by the SEC, which acknowledged that it did not meet the expected standards.
Tom Emmer directly asked Gary Gensler, "Don't you feel embarrassed when we talk about this today
Regarding this, Gary Gensler responded, "The handling of this case is indeed not very good
On the other hand, Tom Emmer also criticized Gary Gensler as the most "destructive" and "lawless" chairman in the 90 year history of the regulatory agency during the hearing. Tom Emmer told Gary Gensler during the House Financial Services Committee hearing:
You created the term cryptocurrency securities. We cannot have a more historically destructive or lawless SEC chairman
Over the years, many members of Congress have criticized the SEC's cryptocurrency regulatory approach, believing that the rules for the industry are not clear enough. But there is also a group of lawmakers who are cautious about cryptocurrencies, such as Maxine Waters from the Democratic Party, who believe that the SEC is fulfilling its responsibility to protect investors and ensure that the US capital market maintains a global leading position.
This hearing coincides with the election season, and cryptocurrency has become a hot topic. According to a report by consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, cryptocurrency companies have already spent $119 million in 2024, with the majority of funds flowing into political action committees, particularly the Fairshake PAC.
Tom Emmer also mentioned Vice President He Jinli's recent remarks on cryptocurrency. He Jinli stated that she will "encourage innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence and digital assets, while protecting consumers and investors," and will create a "transparent and consistent business environment.
Tom Emmer asked Gary Gensler:
Is this also your strategy? Or is she criticizing you because she thinks you haven't been able to establish clear enough rules in her government over the past three years
Gary Gensler stated that there are currently legal norms in place, but Congress can change these laws, cleverly avoiding this issue and shifting responsibility back to Congress.
Comparison between baseball tickets and NFTs
On the other hand, Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres also raised questions about how the SEC defines securities, using the example of tickets for the New York Yankees. The cryptocurrency supporter asked Gary Gensler if purchasing a Yankees ticket would be considered a security, and pointed out that the ticket allowed him to enter and watch the game.
The background of Ritchie Torres' question is that the SEC has sued multiple NFT issuers, accusing them of issuing unregistered securities, including Stoner Cats 2 LLC.
Ritchie Torres asked:
From a legal perspective, is there any difference under federal securities law between buying a ticket to watch a Yankees game and buying an NFT to watch an animated web series
Gary Gensler responded that it depends on how the product is provided and sold, and cited Howey's test to illustrate whether there is an investment contract. This test is based on the 1946 ruling of the United States Supreme Court and is used to determine whether an asset belongs to securities.
Regarding this, Ritchie Torres retorted, "People's expectations of whether something can appreciate in value or be sold for profit in the secondary market can apply to any collectible, consumer goods, artwork, or musical work
(责任编辑:现货金)
- ·从两块披萨到大类资产:盘点比特币 16 年崛起路上的 27 位关键推手
- ·百万医疗险包含意外险吗?这类保险保障范围包括意外伤害吗?
- ·火币比特币提现
- ·兰生股份:2024年1-9月共主承办展会17场,租馆面积超800万平方米,持有其他权益工具投资约14.5亿元
- ·宜人贷贷款需要输入网银吗?
- ·memeBIAN卓下载地址入口 memeBIAN卓手机平台最新版
- ·火币okcoin
- ·4月30日市场关键情报,你错过了多少?
- ·GENIUS稳定币法案拆解:发行资格、监管红线与核心用途全梳理
- ·欧意交易所app官网 欧意okb手机app链接
- ·专门借款和一般借款怎么区别
- ·华海药业(600521.SH):HB0056注射液获得药物临床试验许可
- ·土地增值税预征的计税依据是什么
- ·创耀科技:2024年前三季度在无线星闪芯片及工业总线芯片应用方面取得进展,预计年底前有相关新品上市
- ·eth钱包创建钱包-eth钱包教程创建
- ·转出未交增值税年底余额怎么处理
- · 虚拟货币交易平台排名
- · okx官方
- · OK交易所官网入口登录
- · 欧亿交易所怎么样。
- · 十大虚拟货币交易平台app
- · okx交易所app官网链接
- · oe交易所app下载
- · 全球三大虚拟货币交易平台
- · okx网页版
- · 欧亿app官网正式版下载